The Greatest Generation

Gone but not forgotten

1.1.1.1 Robert Smith

Persona: Robert Smith

Persona: Robert Smith (Deceased, Born 1918)

Basic Demographics:

Name: Robert Smith

Year of Birth: 1918

Year of Death: Deceased (Exact year unspecified)

Race: White British

Place of Birth: UK, likely in a working-class industrial town or city

Occupation:

• Factory worker early in life, during and after World War II

• Union official in the post-war years, active in defending the interests of British workers

Residence: Working-class neighborhood in a major industrial city (likely cities like Birmingham, Liverpool, or Manchester)

Family:

• Married with two or three children, who grew up during the post-war period of economic rebuilding and social change in the UK

• Several grandchildren born in the late 20th century, who grew up during the era of deindustrialization

Generation: Greatest Generation

Life Story and Context:

Born in 1918, Robert Smith grew up during the interwar years, a time of economic depression, hardship, and class struggle in the UK. His early years were marked by economic instability, as the effects of World War I and the Great Depression created a challenging environment for working-class families. Robert likely left school early to enter the workforce, possibly in his teens, and eventually found work in a factory during World War II, where labor was in high demand to support the war effort.

After the war, Robert became heavily involved in the trade union movement, which was vital in protecting workers’ rights in a rapidly changing economy. The influx of foreign laborers during the post-war reconstruction period, including immigrants from former British colonies, created tensions in the workplace. Robert, already experiencing the post-war economic uncertainty and nationalist sentiments, saw these immigrants as a direct threat to the jobs and wages of UK nationals. As a union official, he became one of the vocal far-right agitators, leading efforts to protect “British jobs” and stoking fears about foreign labor.

Goals and Needs:

Job Security for British Workers: Robert’s primary goal was to protect the jobs of British nationals, especially working-class men like himself, who he believed were under threat from foreign labor. He saw himself as a defender of the rights of the native British workforce.

Economic Stability: Having grown up during the Great Depression and experienced post-war rationing and austerity, Robert sought economic stability for his family and community. He feared that foreign workers would undercut wages and destabilize the economy.

Preservation of Traditional Values: Robert believed in the preservation of British culture, values, and way of life. He viewed the increasing diversity in the workforce and society as an erosion of these values.

Power and Influence within the Union: As a union official, Robert sought to maintain a position of influence within the labor movement. His leadership was often driven by his belief that he was protecting the working-class from external threats, both economic and cultural.

Pain Points:

Fear of Job Loss: Robert’s greatest fear was that foreign workers were displacing native-born British workers, reducing job opportunities for men like him. This fear was particularly acute in the post-war years when the UK economy was transitioning, and industries were looking for cheap labor.

Economic Anxiety: Having lived through periods of great economic instability, including the Great Depression and post-war rationing, Robert’s economic anxieties fueled his hostility towards foreign labor. He believed that the competition for jobs would lower wages and further impoverish the working class.

Nationalist and Cultural Concerns: Robert feared that the growing presence of immigrants was diluting British culture and values. His perception of cultural loss was a major driver behind his agitation, leading him to promote far-right, nationalist ideologies.

Union Power Dynamics: As a union official, Robert faced internal conflicts within the labor movement, where some factions were more progressive and supportive of international solidarity. His far-right stance on immigration sometimes caused friction with more moderate or left-leaning union members.

Stigmatization of Immigrants: Robert contributed to the stigmatization of foreign workers, viewing them as an “other” who could not be trusted or integrated into British society. He saw their presence as a threat to both the economic and social fabric of the nation.

Family Life and Residence:

Wife: Robert was married to a woman who likely shared his concerns about economic stability and the changing social landscape of post-war Britain. She may have worked part-time or stayed at home, managing the household and supporting his activism within the union.

Children: He had two or three children, all of whom grew up during the post-war boom but faced economic uncertainty as industries began to decline in the latter part of the 20th century. Robert’s focus on protecting jobs for British nationals was partly driven by his desire to secure a future for his children.

Grandchildren: Robert lived long enough to see his grandchildren grow up in the era of deindustrialization in the 1970s and 1980s, when many of the industries he once fought to protect began to decline. He likely imparted to them his strong beliefs in nationalism and the importance of protecting British jobs.

Place of Residence: Robert lived in a working-class neighborhood in a large industrial city, possibly Birmingham or Liverpool, where tensions over labor and immigration were high. His neighborhood would have been economically struggling, and he would have witnessed firsthand the impacts of foreign labor on his community.

Personality Traits:

Nationalistic and Defensive: Robert was fiercely nationalistic and believed in the primacy of British workers and culture. He viewed foreign labor and immigration as threats and was vocal in his efforts to protect what he saw as the “British way of life.”

Stubborn and Rigid: Robert was set in his beliefs and had little tolerance for perspectives that differed from his own. His rigidity made him resistant to change or compromise, particularly in discussions about immigration or multiculturalism.

Charismatic Leader: Despite his divisive views, Robert was charismatic and able to rally support among his fellow workers. His forceful personality and willingness to speak out on contentious issues made him a prominent figure within his union.

Protective of His Own: Robert was deeply protective of his family and his working-class community. His activism was driven by a sense of duty to provide security and opportunity for his children and grandchildren.

Angry and Fearful: Beneath his public persona, Robert was driven by deep-seated fears—of job loss, cultural erosion, and economic instability. These fears often manifested as anger, which he directed at foreign laborers and progressive elements within the labor movement.

Patterns of Behavior:

Agitating in the Workplace: As a union official, Robert frequently agitated against the hiring of foreign labor. He would have been vocal at union meetings, organizing strikes or protests to demand job protection for British nationals. He saw himself as a champion for British workers, often drawing on nationalist rhetoric.

Stoking Fear and Division: Robert was known for using fear-based tactics to rally support, often emphasizing the threat posed by foreign workers. His speeches and actions contributed to the civil unrest and divisiveness in the workplace, perpetuating stereotypes and increasing tensions between British and immigrant workers.

Defensive in Discussions: Robert resisted attempts to engage in meaningful discussions about the benefits of diversity or international labor solidarity. He saw these arguments as a threat to his beliefs and would shut down such conversations, often retreating to nationalist talking points.

Parental Influence: At home, Robert passed on his beliefs to his children and grandchildren, encouraging them to be wary of immigrants and to prioritize their own interests. His influence would have shaped their worldview, particularly during periods of economic hardship.

Active in Far-Right Politics: Over time, Robert’s views became more aligned with far-right nationalist ideologies. He may have participated in or supported political movements that sought to curb immigration and promote a more insular, nationalist Britain.

In summary, Robert Smith was a product of his time—born into economic hardship and driven by fears of foreign labor displacing British workers. As a union official, he became a vocal agitator against immigration, using nationalist rhetoric to protect jobs for native-born workers. His rigid beliefs, charismatic leadership, and deep-seated fears shaped his activism and the divisive role he played in post-war labor unrest. His legacy within his family and community was one of protectionism, fear of cultural erosion, and resistance to change.