1.2.5 Social isolation

A proactive approach to socialisation

1. Who is Affected?

The primary stakeholders in this discussion are those who suffer from and are involved in perpetuating epistemic injustice, gaslighting, trolling, and unequal justice.

Victims of Epistemic Injustice: These are individuals or groups whose knowledge, experiences, or voices are systematically undervalued or dismissed, often due to biases based on race, gender, socioeconomic status, or other factors. For instance, marginalized communities may find their lived experiences discredited.

Targets of Gaslighting and Trolling: Often activists, whistleblowers, or individuals advocating for justice, these individuals may face psychological manipulation or harassment aimed at discrediting their perspectives and destabilizing their mental well-being.

Perpetrators: People or groups who intentionally (or sometimes unintentionally) contribute to these injustices by questioning the validity of others’ experiences, spreading misinformation, or enforcing unequal justice norms. This includes both individuals in positions of authority and anonymous actors online.

The Public and Bystanders: Society as a whole becomes both the audience and participant in perpetuating or challenging these injustices, depending on their level of awareness, empathy, and response.

2. What is the Problem?

The problem lies in how socialization—the process by which individuals learn and internalize societal norms, values, and biases—contributes to the perpetuation of epistemic injustice, gaslighting, trolling, and unequal justice. These issues are interconnected and mutually reinforcing:

Epistemic Injustice: This occurs when certain groups are systematically excluded from being seen as credible knowledge-bearers. For instance, voices from marginalized communities may be dismissed in discussions around public policy, criminal justice, or healthcare, reinforcing social and political power imbalances.

Gaslighting: This form of psychological manipulation makes individuals or groups doubt their own reality, typically to silence or control them. For example, victims of discrimination may be told they are “too sensitive” or are “misinterpreting” events, a tactic often used to maintain control.

Trolling: In the digital sphere, trolling often targets advocates of justice, with the intent of intimidating them, spreading misinformation, or causing harm. Trolling perpetuates harmful narratives that weaken collective support for justice-based movements.

Unequal Justice: Structural biases in the justice system often mean that marginalized groups receive harsher treatment or fewer protections. Socialization supports these patterns by reinforcing stereotypes and normalized biases, influencing public opinion and even policy.

3. When Do These Issues Arise?

These issues are longstanding, arising both in specific contexts and over time as society reinforces certain values and biases.

Historical Roots: Epistemic injustice, gaslighting, trolling, and unequal justice are not new; they’re embedded in societal norms and legal structures, often dating back to colonial, patriarchal, and capitalist roots. As such, they emerge consistently in historical and contemporary contexts.

In Times of Social or Political Change: These issues often become more pronounced during periods of social upheaval, political debate, or reform movements. For instance, during movements like #MeToo or Black Lives Matter, the experiences of marginalized groups come to the forefront, only to be dismissed or undermined by gaslighting, trolling, or epistemic injustice.

4. Where Do These Issues Manifest?

The consequences of socialization can be seen across both physical and digital spaces:

Institutional Settings: Schools, workplaces, and courts reflect societal biases, where epistemic injustice and unequal justice may shape outcomes. For example, in academia, certain narratives are valued over others, marginalizing voices that diverge from the mainstream